![]() Of the new Republican seats gained in the 2018 midterm election, only two are women, and the racial demographic profile of the party is almost exclusively white. Furthermore, women running for the Democratic Party are more likely to win than Republican women, and have thus Democratic women have gained more seats. As a result, the Democratic Party became identified with women and in 2018 gained a ratio of more than 3:1 in female candidates compared to the Republican Party, where the number of women has not changed considerably. politics where a large number of incumbents left office or were defeated, leaving room for women to enter the arena. In addition, there was a change in the zeitgeist of U.S. Another factor was that healthcare was a key issue for women in that election. Supreme Court nomination which involved allegations of sexual harassment. This is partly due to a controversial U.S. ![]() This changed significantly in 1992, especially in the Democratic Party where the number of women running for election in the Democratic Party was approximately 2:1 compared to the Republican Party. The dramatic increase in the overall number and number of female Democratic candidates seeking to run against Trump in 2020 is a remarkable indication of this trend.īefore 1992, there was no difference between Democratic and Republican parties in the likelihood of women running for office. Additionally, the last two years has seen the rise of the #MeToo movement, where cases of sexual harassment, assault, and discrimination have been made public to combat the perpetrators, and this combined with the response to Trump's election and policies have inspired women to enter politics. After the Trump inauguration, a women's march was held in Washington which galvanized political opinion, encouraged and organized candidates for office, and highlighted concerns related to the Trump administration. The 2018 elections were different in terms of issues relating to women voters, candidates, and women in general. This is a comparison of those assessments. 1992 was first called the year of the woman. The mobilization of women in Democratic politicsĢ018 was dubbed "the year of the woman" due to the increased presence of power exercised throughout society. ![]() The change in public opinion of foreign countries treatment is largely due to Democratic voters, whose opinions also shifted significantly since President Trump's election, and this partisan divide is a new phenomenon. This trend has increased gradually from 1994 to 2018 where the proportion reached almost 50%. Polls of whether foreign countries treat the United States fairly or not in terms of trade demonstrate that public opinion has been shifting with voters increasingly viewing the United States as being fairly treated, in contrast to the Trump administration's position on the topic. Similarly, immigration policy and foreign policy also showed findings that suggested these policies negatively affected Republican Party performance on the midterm elections. Regarding trade policy, only a minority of voters found the policy to be helpful, of which these voters were predominantly Republican voters, while the majority, who thought the policy had no impact or hurt the economy, voted for Democratic candidates. Voters were quizzed on President Trump's trade, immigration and foreign policies as they exited polling stations. The Democratic candidates benefited from these issues because Democratic voters were more energetic in the election and their issues gained prominence. Whereas Democratic voters focused on issues of healthcare, treatment of women, income and wealth disparities, gun policy, and climate change. The US president has vehemently promised to repeal and replace Obamacare, for example, which Republican senators failed to do last year.Republican voters prioritized issues of the economy, illegal immigration, taxes, and gun policy. Some of Mr Trump’s key agendas and campaign promises could be revived if Republicans hold control of Congress. What effects will the 2018 midterm elections have on the future of Trump’s presidency? Since Florida Governor Rick Scott took office in 2011, he reversed efforts by his predecessor to restore the right to vote to former felons with nonviolent convictions, making it markedly more difficult for ex-felons to have their voting rights restored. Nearly 1.5 million Floridians have been disenfranchised as a result. Florida, for example, is one of the few states that permanently strips voting rights from people convicted of a felony. With control of Congress swaying either way, each party could have the advantage to pass their legislative agendas – or to block opposing agendas and the president’s Supreme Court nominees from being confirmed.Īdditionally, gubernatorial elections could have momentous implications on the rights to vote for millions of citizens.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |